• Brask Bryan posted an update 6 months, 3 weeks ago

    Mastectomy for chest masculinization is a commonly performed gender-affirming surgery in minor patients, a vulnerable population with unique developmental and psychosocial needs. We aimed to use principles of medical ethics (eg, autonomy, beneficence, nonmaleficence, and justice) as a framework to analyze preoperative clinical decision making by pediatric plastic surgeons who work with transmasculine and nonbinary adolescents designated female at birth presenting for chest masculinization. Two patients were selected for inclusion in this case series based on the senior author’s (J.F.C.) clinical experience. A retrospective chart review was conducted to extract relevant psychosocial and clinical information from clinic notes and supplemental documentation (eg, letters from outside providers) available in the electronic medical record. In case A, a 17-year-old patient presented to a plastic surgery clinic with mixed parental support and restrictive insurance requirements. In case B, a 16-year-old patient presr author’s (J.F.C.) clinical experience. A retrospective chart review was conducted to extract relevant psychosocial and clinical information from clinic notes and supplemental documentation (eg, letters from outside providers) available in the electronic medical record. In case A, a 17-year-old patient presented to a plastic surgery clinic with mixed parental support and restrictive insurance requirements. In case B, a 16-year-old patient presented to the emergency room after an attempt to remove his own breasts. The cases highlight the role of the plastic surgeon in advocating for adolescent autonomy and justice by facilitating shared family decision making and navigating barriers to care. In addition, we recommend multidisciplinary care, including trusted, transcompetent mental health professionals, to ensure beneficence and nonmaleficence by providing timely care when appropriate.

    As the detection of breast cancer in Ghana improves, the incidence of mastectomy has increased and the outcomes have improved. As a secondary result, the need for breast reconstruction is increasing. The cultural hesitation to undergo a mastectomy and live without a breast can be decreased by making breast reconstruction available, cost-effective, and acceptable. Cultural, economic, and technical factors were considered in choosing the best method of breast reconstruction. Discussions, lectures, and cadaver dissections investigated the various reconstructive options. Operative cases were performed using a latissimus musculocutaneous flap, a lower abdominal transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (TRAM) flap, and a midabdominal TRAM flap. The midabdominal TRAM was found to be the best choice at Komfo Anokye Teaching Hospital. It is a reliable, robust, well-perfused, single-stage flap that produced excellent patient satisfaction.

    As the detection of breast cancer in Ghana improves, the incidence of mastectomy has increased and the outcomes have improved. As a secondary result, the need for breast reconstruction is increasing. The cultural hesitation to undergo a mastectomy and live without a breast can be decreased by making breast reconstruction available, cost-effective, and acceptable. Cultural, economic, and technical factors were considered in choosing the best method of breast reconstruction. Discussions, lectures, and cadaver dissections investigated the various reconstructive options. Operative cases were performed using a latissimus musculocutaneous flap, a lower abdominal transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (TRAM) flap, and a midabdominal TRAM flap. The midabdominal TRAM was found to be the best choice at Komfo Anokye Teaching Hospital. Rocaglamide in vivo It is a reliable, robust, well-perfused, single-stage flap that produced excellent patient satisfaction.On July 24, 2019, the Parliament of the United Kingdom passed an act that included an amendment requiring Northern Ireland to implement recommendations from the Committee on the Elimination on Discrimination Against Women. The amendment required Northern Ireland to repeal the 1861 abortion act and requires the decriminalization of abortion. The law went into effect on October 22, 2019, since the Northern Ireland power-sharing government (Stormont) did not reconvene before October 21, 2019. Since the law did go into effect, it gave women the right to obtain abortions under the CEDAW recommendations; however, when the Northern Irish government (Stormont) reconvenes, it can recriminalize abortion. They made this attempt when Stormont under DUP leadership reconvened briefly on January 11, 2020 before the official Brexit the next day. This Note argues that abortion should be legal in Northern Ireland regardless of whether the new legislation from British Parliament ever went into effect or gets overturned by the Stormont legislature because of several treaties and domestic decisions from the Supreme Court in Belfast and the new regulations made in accordance with the amendment need to meet the standards of the CEDAW recommendations.In 2019, the United States saw the single largest outbreak of measles in recent history. The measles crisis has prompted state legislative bodies to face a seemingly impossible dilemma eliminate both religious and philosophical exemptions to mandatory school vaccination statutes or sit by idly and allow measles to continue to run its course. As of June 2019, five states have neither religious nor philosophical exemptions to their mandatory vaccination statutes. This Note argues that states should remove all religious and philosophical exemptions to compulsory vaccination statutes. The 2019 measles outbreak demonstrates that the anti-vaccination movement poses a legitimate risk to the health of the masses, especially to the most vulnerable members of our communities. If individuals continue to opt out of compulsory vaccination requirements, diseases that were eradicated decades ago will undoubtably return to the absolute detriment of those unable to protect themselves.The United States has failed its citizens who suffer from severe and persistent mental illness (SPMI). Homelessness is one of the most obvious manifestations of this failure. The combination of a lack of effective treatment, inadequate entitlement programs such as Social Security Disability Insurance (SSDI), and subpar housing options form systemic barriers that prevent people suffering from mental illness from being able to obtain adequate housing. Cultural beliefs within the United States regarding who is homeless and what homelessness means also play a significant role in the development of positively impactful social welfare programs. Part II of this Note reviews the history of treatment for persons with SPMI–specifically how that treatment has evolved, the history of federal policies regarding SSI, SSDI and housing, and societal beliefs regarding homelessness and mental illness that have impacted policymaking decisions. Part III looks at these same areas from a current perspective and addresses the current issues and some possible solutions.

All content contained on CatsWannaBeCats.Com, unless otherwise acknowledged,is the property of CatsWannaBeCats.Com and subject to copyright.

CONTACT US

We're not around right now. But you can send us an email and we'll get back to you, asap.

Sending

Log in with your credentials

or    

Forgot your details?

Create Account