• Kjellerup Warner posted an update a month ago

    The routine care of cancer patients has not adequately incorporated patient-reported outcomes due to the existing instruments’ often excessive length and complexity, or their lack of cancer-specific focus. This study’s primary goal is to analyze the psychometric properties and reduce the item count in a newly developed health-related quality of life (HrQoL) questionnaire for clinical use in oncology.

    In this repeated-measures observational study, both inpatients and outpatients with cancer were examined. At the initial assessment, a total of 630 patients participated; at the subsequent measurement, 404 patients were involved. In order to evaluate the instrument, we carried out hierarchical confirmatory factor analyses, and for further validation, we correlated the extracted factors with established and standardized HrQoL measurements. The stability of the test and its sensitivity to improvements were scrutinized, concerning test-retest reliability and responsiveness to change.

    A six-factor structure is observed in the developed HELP-6 (Hamburg Inventory for Measuring Quality of Life in Oncological Patients) questionnaire, which also exhibits moderate-to-good convergent validity.

    A numerically precise representation of the decimal quantity is negative zero point zero two five zero six eight. A moderate-to-good test-retest reliability coefficient was obtained from the assessments.

    =056-081,

    A list of sentences is returned by this JSON schema. acat signal Evidence of adaptability across three dimensions was observed. A single item represents each of the six dimensions in the final iteration of the HELP-6 questionnaire.

    In cancer patients, the HELP-6 instrument for measuring HrQoL serves as a brief and practical patient-reported outcome measure. Confirming adaptability across all areas proved challenging in this research, but the HELP-6 shines in its time-efficient completion and evaluation, offering relevant information regarding the health-related quality of life of cancer patients. Accordingly, the HELP-6 is an essential addition to the standard course of cancer care for inpatients and outpatients alike.

    This study’s registration details can be found on the Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/y7xce/), a repository for open science. The year two thousand and eighteen marked the ninth of June.

    This investigation’s registration details can be found on the Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/y7xce/). In the year two thousand and eighteen, on June ninth.

    Understanding the role personality traits played in the adaptive coping strategies of university students during the initial COVID-19 period is a critical area of inquiry. University students, a population consistently bound by social distancing mandates, were a direct consequence of many organizations swiftly transitioning from in-person to online learning methods. Accordingly, a study examining the Big Five traits’ influence as either risk or protective factors on Italian university students after the COVID-19 pandemic is worthwhile.

    University students, numbering 2995, completed an online survey in the month of March 2020. The Robust-Pandemic Coping Scale, in combination with the Big Five Inventory-2-XS, served to quantify coping strategies and Big Five personality traits, respectively. This subsequent assessment considered four dimensions of coping with COVID-19: Despair (including feelings of helplessness and lack of control), Aversion (involving opposing strategies), Proactivity (encompassing problem-solving and information-seeking), and Adjustment (involving reappraisal and assertiveness).

    Initial analyses using Linear Mixed Models revealed that university students demonstrated higher scores in Conscientiousness, followed by Open-Mindedness, and culminating in Agreeableness. These three traits demonstrated greater levels than Extraversion and Negative Emotionality, which showed no variations between one another. In relation to coping mechanisms, university students displayed a stronger inclination toward the use of adaptive strategies, particularly proactivity over adjustment, in contrast to the less frequent use of maladaptive strategies, where despair exceeded aversion. Path analysis, used to examine the connections between the Big Five personality traits and four coping styles, demonstrated Negative Emotionality as a risk factor and Agreeableness, Conscientiousness, and Openness as contributing to resilience. Our study uncovered an unexpected finding: Extraversion manifested as both a threat and a buffer for Italian university students in the aftermath of the COVID-19 pandemic.

    Even with limitations, the significance of these findings lies in their potential to underpin the development of disaster prevention and preparedness initiatives, supporting positive student adaptation to present and future crises.

    While limitations exist, these results provide a springboard for creating disaster prevention and response plans, promoting positive student resilience in dealing with current and future disasters.

    In the Italian context of Reggio Emilia’s primary and secondary schools, this study delved into the application of metaphors for interpreting the pandemic’s effects and addressing the resulting obstacles. To analyze how language, images, and metaphors were used by educators, teachers, and their students in discussions about the pandemic and their lived experiences, a questionnaire was employed. The questionnaire’s purpose was to foster critical reflection and promote more judicious linguistic selections. Although the existing literature has suggested an excessive use of war metaphors and military frameworks in public discourse, our research indicates that war metaphors appear relatively frequently, coexisting with a substantial number of other metaphorical frameworks used effectively by educators to develop resilient responses in students. Beyond that, teachers and educators in their professional spheres predominantly utilize metaphorical frameworks surrounding resilient character. Based on our findings, we concur with the hypothesis that the deliberate use and purposeful creation of metaphors contribute towards the choice of metaphors with positive and constructive meanings. This section delves into the implications of these results for the field of metaphor and the subsequent research methodologies.

    The COVID-19 lockdowns’ imposition of online emergency remote teaching practices fueled an inevitable technological surge, culminating in a worrying increase in nomophobia (NMP) and smartphone addiction (SA) among teenagers, a subject currently being thoroughly investigated. Undeniably, the effect of social media tool use (SMTU) and digital gaming behaviors (DGB) on these developments remains ambiguous, due to a lack of studies that delve into the intricate connections between these variables. Within this context, the current investigation sought to examine the concurrent mediating function of secondary school students’ SMTU and DGB in the connection between NMP and SA.

    A cross-sectional study utilizing a critical case sampling approach was employed in this research. Data collection involved an online survey with 427 secondary school students in Istanbul during the 2021-2022 academic year. Utilizing PROCESS models with 5000 bootstrapped samples from a BC distribution and a 95% confidence interval, we implemented multiple linear regression models to assess the parallel mediation model.

    Home confinement during the COVID-19 pandemic corresponded with an increase in the prevalence of NMP and SA, as anticipated by earlier studies. The study’s results emphasized that SMTU’s mediating role, from the multiple mediators examined, was crucial in the relationship between NMP and SA. NMP’s effect on SA is substantial, encompassing both direct and indirect routes through SMTU’s intermediary role. However, DGB’s mediating role in this correlation was deemed not substantial. The sturdy nature of our results provides pivotal theoretical and practical contributions to educational psychology research by unraveling the intricate mechanistic links between NMP, SMTU, DGB, and SA. In the realm of practical application, our research findings provide meaningful insights for school boards and researchers in developing effective interventions.

    The COVID-19 home confinement period saw a rise in NMP and SA prevalence, echoing prior research findings. Analysis of the results highlighted a significant mediating effect of SMTU, specifically in the relationship between NMP and SA, among the multiple mediators. NMP’s influence on SA is substantial and significant, operating both directly and indirectly via SMTU as a crucial intermediary. Nonetheless, the mediating effect of DGB proved statistically insignificant in this connection. Our research’s robust results on NMP, SMTU, DGB, and SA make significant contributions to both the theoretical and practical realms of educational psychology, by clarifying the complex causal mechanisms linking these variables. In terms of practical application, our research results yield significant implications for school boards and researchers in the design of impactful interventions.

    The study’s objective was to explore the current condition and root causes of the underacknowledgment of the psychological needs of patients with widespread skin disorders.

    A cross-sectional online survey, administered via social media platforms in China, was used to collect data for this study. Data encompassing demographics, medical history, and psychological profiles were collected, with the key outcome variables being depression (evaluated using the 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire, PHQ-9) and anxiety (evaluated via the Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7, GAD-7). Mental health service-seeking behaviors were predicted using multivariate regression analysis, examining the relevant variables.

    A total of 1010 patients were included in a survey; 273 of these patients (270 percent) met the necessary criteria for mental health intervention, but did not receive the necessary treatment. Within the multivariate regression framework, income (odds ratio 0.80, 95% confidence interval 0.65-0.99), disease duration (odds ratio 0.68, 95% confidence interval 0.49-0.95), and suicidal ideation (odds ratio 2.10, 95% confidence interval 1.14-3.87) proved to be statistically significant predictors.

All content contained on CatsWannaBeCats.Com, unless otherwise acknowledged,is the property of CatsWannaBeCats.Com and subject to copyright.

CONTACT US

We're not around right now. But you can send us an email and we'll get back to you, asap.

Sending

Log in with your credentials

or    

Forgot your details?

Create Account