-
Greer Thorsen posted an update 6 months, 2 weeks ago
Physical exercise, non-active serious amounts of healthy reputation in B razil kids cerebral palsy.
d patients, who did not meet the inclusion criteria.
Bradford Hill criteria analysis failed to support a causal relationship between periodontal microbes/oral health care and respiratory diseases such as pneumonia.
Bradford Hill criteria analysis failed to support a causal relationship between periodontal microbes/oral health care and respiratory diseases such as pneumonia.
Women involved with the criminal justice system are often marginalized or vulnerable and may face oral health inequities. find more Through a community-engaged program at a Canadian university, dental hygiene students provided preventive care at an organization supporting this population. This study explored the impact of these oral care services from client and organization staff perspectives.
One focus group with 6 clients, 2-person interviews with 4 clients, individual interviews with 3 clients, and one focus group with 4 organization staff members were conducted. Discussions were audio recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analysed thematically. The concept of access, proposed by Penchansky and Thomas (1981) and Saurman (2015), was used as the conceptual framework to organize the themes.
Nine themes were identified from the focus group and interview discussions limited options, convenience, realistic expectations, respect and attention, no judgement, physical environment, communication, clients’ unique needs, aics for this population.
The oral hygiene habits of clients wearing fixed orthodontic appliances is poorly understood. Assessment of oral hygiene behavioural patterns is essential for understanding clients’ oral health care needs. The aim of this study was to investigate orthodontic clients’ oral hygiene behaviours, brushing techniques, and oral hygiene awareness.
A total of 200 orthodontic clients wearing fixed orthodontic appliances were consecutively recruited from the Sichuan Provincial Hospital, Chengdu, China, and the Faculty of Dentistry, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand. A 47-item questionnaire was used to survey study participants.
The survey had a 92% response rate, with 67.5% of respondents being female and 32.5% male. Most were non-smokers (94.2%) and the majority (80.0%) brushed their teeth twice daily. find more Most (80.4%) brushed their teeth for 1 to 2 minutes, and 68.7% positioned their toothbrush both horizontally and vertically, with horizontal being the preferred direction of motion. One-third (33.5%) did not use any auxiliary oral hygiene aids; most snacked between meals; only 31.4% received professional tooth cleaning during orthodontic treatment; and 56.8% experienced an increased level of halitosis after appliance placement. Most respondents (79.4%) thought their oral hygiene was good, but 51.0% reported bleeding gums during tooth brushing, 31.4% found they rarely bled, and only 17.6% reported no bleeding. Most respondents agreed that good oral health was very important for orthodontic treatment and that their own efforts were the most important factors.
Client awareness of the importance of oral hygiene during orthodontic treatment requires improvement. Clinician reinforcement of oral hygiene should become a priority for orthodontic clients.
Client awareness of the importance of oral hygiene during orthodontic treatment requires improvement. Clinician reinforcement of oral hygiene should become a priority for orthodontic clients.
The purpose of this qualitative descriptive study was to explore dental hygiene diagnosis (DHDx) to gain an understanding of how dental hygienists experience this phenomenon while providing dental hygiene care.
A qualitative descriptive research design was employed using purposive sampling. Data were collected from semi-structured interviews with 10 dental hygienists actively practising in California, Oregon or Colorado. The interviews were audiorecorded, transcribed verbatim, and verified for accuracy. Data analysis included open coding and axial coding to determine larger, related segments of data called categories providing an overall descriptive summary of DHDx. Two independent peer examinations and member checks established validity of the data analysis.
Four categories emerged from the study expertise and confidence; client communication; dental hygiene care plan; and dentists’ trust. Participants revealed that expertise and confidence in performing the DHDx was gained through clinical practice. D compare how DHDx is utilized by dental hygienists in other countries.Previous position papers have confirmed associations between periodontal disease and adverse pregnancy outcomes. Causal associations have not been confirmed and have been the source of much confusion for the profession and public.
To investigate whether sufficient evidence exists for a causal relationship between periodontal disease and adverse pregnancy outcomes.
The PICO question was “For adults in good general health who are diagnosed with periodontal disease, will receiving non-surgical periodontal therapy (NSPT), as compared to not receiving non-surgical periodontal therapy, lower their risk for adverse pregnancy outcomes?” Only systematic reviews (SRs) with or without meta-analyses (MAs) of randomized controlled trials published in the English language between 2007 and 2019 were included. Databases searched included PubMed, MEDLINE, EbscoHost, CINAHL, Scopus, Cochrane Registry of Systematic Reviews, and Clinical Trials Registry. Quality assessments were conducted by both authors using the PRISMA checklist. The Bradford Hill criteria were used to determine evidence for causality.
Of 37 records retrieved for adverse pregnancy outcomes, 9 met the criteria for inclusion and were analysed. None showed that NSPT lowers the risk for adverse pregnancy outcomes.
Bradford Hill criteria analysis failed to support a causal relationship between periodontal disease and adverse pregnancy outcomes based on the most current evidence available.
Bradford Hill criteria analysis failed to support a causal relationship between periodontal disease and adverse pregnancy outcomes based on the most current evidence available.
The purpose of this review is to explore the literature on continuous assessment in the evaluation of clinical competence, to examine the variables influencing the assessment of clinical competence, and to consider the impact of high-stakes summative assessment practices on student experiences, learning, and achievement.
A literature search of CINAHL, PubMed, ERIC (EBSCO), Education Source, and Google Scholar was conducted using key terms. Articles reviewed were limited to full-text, peer-reviewed articles published in English from 2000 to 2019. Selected articles for this review include a meta-analysis, systematic reviews, and studies using qualitative and quantitative designs.
Findings reveal that current assessment practices such as one-time high-stakes assessments in the evaluation of clinical competence are influenced by several variables interexaminer differences in evaluation, variability with non-standardized client use in assessment, the failure to fail, and the impact of stress on performance outcomes.
Please follow & like us :)
All content contained on CatsWannaBeCats.Com, unless otherwise acknowledged,is the property of CatsWannaBeCats.Com and subject to copyright.