-
Ortega MacKinnon posted an update 6 months, 3 weeks ago
Their mean age was significantly lower than that of HEALTH patients (66 vs. 79 years; P < 0.001). HEALTH trial patients were significantly more likely to be female, have ASA classification Class III/IV/V, and carry a diagnosis of osteoporosis, as compared with the subgroup of FAITH patients with displaced femoral neck fractures (P < 0.001).
This study demonstrates significant differences between patients enrolled in the 2 trials. Although both studies focused on femoral neck fractures with similar enrollment criteria, patient populations differed. This sheds light on a noteworthy limitation of discordant patient enrollment into randomized trials, despite similar eligibility criteria.
Therapeutic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Therapeutic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Men who have sex with men are disproportionately burdened by HIV/AIDS, and the advent of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) has provided an effective strategy to reduce the risk of HIV transmission. Research has shown that improving one partner’s health-promoting behaviors increases the likelihood that their partner adopts healthier behaviors. see more We examined the longitudinal relationship between favorable HIV treatment outcomes with current PrEP use among HIV serodiscordant male partners.
Data are from Project Stronger Together, a randomized controlled trial that recruited serodiscordant male couples from Atlanta, GA; Boston, MA; and Chicago, IL.
Serodiscordant couples completed assessments at baseline, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months. We analyzed longitudinal data from 120 HIV serodiscordant male partners to assess the relationship between the HIV-negative partner’s current PrEP use and their HIV-positive partner’s current ART use, ART adherence, and viral load using generalized estimating equation models.
Fewer to develop programs that improve health outcomes for both partners.
Pregnant and breastfeeding women in Option B+ in Malawi received antiretroviral drugs (ARVs) containing efavirenz (EFV) and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF). However, effects on growth, renal, bone metabolism, and neurodevelopment of long-term exposure to low doses of these drugs through breast milk in HIV-exposed infants are unclear.
Prospective cohorts of TDF-and-EFV-exposed and TDF-and-EFV-unexposed breastfed infants of HIV-infected and HIV-uninfected mothers in Option B+ were recruited in 21 ratio, respectively, followed from birth to 18 months. Infants with low birth weight, premature birth, and congenital abnormalities were excluded. Anthropometrics were assessed at birth, 6 weeks, 3, 6, 12, and 18 months. Neurodevelopment assessments used the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development III from 6 weeks. Creatinine, alkaline phosphatase, and phosphorus were assessed at 3, 6, and 12 months.
Of 260 HIV-and-ARV-exposed and 125 HIV-and-ARV-unexposed infants enrolled at birth, 87% and 57%, 78% awth, neurodevelopment, renal, or bone adverse outcomes. Data support safety of breastfeeding through 18 months within the Option B+ program.
In response to the novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic, Australia introduced public health and physical distancing restrictions in late March 2020. We investigated the impact of these restrictions on HIV preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) use among Australian gay and bisexual men (GBM).
Participants in an ongoing online cohort study previously reported PrEP use from 2014 to 2019. In April 2020, 847 HIV-negative and untested participants completed questionnaires assessing changes in PrEP use as a result of COVID-19 public health measures. Binary logistic multiple regression was used to estimate adjusted odds ratios (aOR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) to compare changes in PrEP use behaviors.
Among 847 men, mean age was 44.1 years (SD 12.7). PrEP use rose from 4.9% in 2015 to 47.2% in 2020. Among those, 41.8% (n = 167) discontinued PrEP use during COVID-19 restrictions. Discontinuing PrEP during COVID-19 restrictions was independently associated with being less likely to have recently testeds indicate a potential need for clear, targeted information about resumption of PrEP and on-demand optimal dosing regimens in response to ongoing changes in restrictions.
Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) is a powerful technique increasingly used to care for patients with refractory cardiac arrest. This review will detail where ECPR fits in the current care of cardiac arrest patients, including the key aspects of ECPR deployment and patient selection shown to maximize its benefit.
ECPR has been shown to improve neurologically favourable survival in patients with refractory cardiac arrest in numerous nonrandomized cohort studies. The haemodynamic, oxygenation and ventilation support provided by ECPR eliminates the need for return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) and prevents ongoing injury from shock or rearrest. However, ECPR is one component of an entire system of resuscitation care necessary for positive outcomes. The intense resources needed require that patient eligibility criteria are well delineated to direct ECPR to patients likely to benefit. The other components of the system, including emergency medical services, cannulation teams and postarrest care teams, also require substantial training and dedication.
ECPR is a system of resuscitation care that must be optimized at every level to successfully treat patients with refractory cardiac arrest.
ECPR is a system of resuscitation care that must be optimized at every level to successfully treat patients with refractory cardiac arrest.
Venous thromboembolism (VTE), which encompasses deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism, is common among trauma patients and critically ill surgical patients admitted to the ICU. Critical care surgical patients are at an extremely high risk for VTE and the related morbidity and mortality associated with it. The present review aims to provide an overview of the importance of identifying risk factors, prescribing effective prohylaxis, accurate diagnosis, and timely appropriate treatment for trauma and critically ill surgical patients with VTE in the ICU.
VTE is a healthcare burden among critically ill surgical patients that is mostly preventable through adherence to prophylactic protocols that aim to recognize VTE risk factors while simultaneously providing guidance to appropriate timing and administration prophylaxis regimens. Newer pharmacologic therapies for prophylaxis and treatment, diagnostic modalities, and indications for therapy of VTE have continued to evolve.
Critical care surgical and trauma patients represent a population that are at a heightened risk for VTE and associated complications.