-
Travis Smedegaard posted an update 6 months ago
Obtaining an arteriovenous (AV) access for initiation of hemodialysis is considered the gold standard as it reduces risks of infections, hospitalizations, and need for interventions. It is well documented that creation of AV access can cause or aggravate heart failure. Once AV access is created, blood volume, cardiac contractility, and left ventricular end-diastolic volume increase in a nonphysiologic fashion resulting in an overall increase in cardiac output. Left ventricular hypertrophy, diastolic dysfunction, pulmonary hypertension, and high-output cardiac failure can occur. AV accesses that have blood flows greater than 1.5 L per minute are of high risk. When access flow exceeds 25% to 30% of cardiac output, the risk of developing high-output heart failure increases. Studies suggest that a blood flow (Qa)/cardiac output (CO) ratio of greater than 0.30 should be used as a screening tool to perform further cardiac testing. Depending on the severity of symptoms, management can range from banding procedure (flow reduction) or need for total abandonment of the AV access. The complications associated with high-flow AV accesses are often overlooked. Nephrologists and vascular access experts should work in tandem to mitigate potential harm to patients on dialysis who are afflicted by this condition.Hand ischemia is a relatively common complication of hemodialysis arteriovenous (AV) access. Clinical manifestations frequently start with pale and cold ipsilateral hand. Symptoms can progress to pain during dialysis and can eventually lead to tissue necrosis and gangrene if not addressed in a timely fashion. Comprehensive physical examination of the hand, AV access, and comparing it with the contralateral hand will assist in differentiating hand ischemia from carpal tunnel syndrome, osteoarthritis of the hand, and others. There are several treatment options for hand ischemia based on the severity of symptoms. Conservative management with careful monitoring can be applied in early stages. However, if symptoms persist or worsen, a full arteriogram of the ipsilateral extremity should be performed to evaluate for the presence of arterial stenosis. Angioplasty of the arterial stenosis, if present, will frequently lead to the resolution of symptoms. There are several percutaneous and surgical treatment options for hand ischemia, if no arterial stenosis was found or angioplasty does not relieve symptoms. We discuss in this article these treatment options in detail. Treatment goal is to improve hand ischemia symptoms while maintaining hemodialysis AV access and preserving patient’s hand. Access ligation remains a treatment of last resort.Needle cannulation of hemodialysis access is the soft underbelly of hemodialysis access care that has remained unchanged for a long time. Cannulation error results in complications such as infiltration, hematoma, subsequent revision procedures, and potential loss of hard-earned access. The “best” cannulation method is contingent upon access type and characteristics along with local expertise. The rope ladder technique of cannulation, characterized by successive rotation of puncture sites with each hemodialysis session, permits sufficient time for healing of prior cannulation sites, and reduction in complications such as bleeding, infection, and aneurysm development. A steeper needle angle, higher blood flow rates, and deep needle tip can lead to wall stress on the posterior wall and up to 10 cm from the needle cannulation site. Plastic cannulas provide a viable alternative to metallic needles; they have lower complications and a favorable cost-benefit ratio. There is lack of evidence to support an optimal arterial needle direction configuration. Needle injury may promote intimal thickening, but its effect on access outcomes is currently unknown. Percutaneous creation of arteriovenous fistula presents new challenges in dialysis access cannulation. Point-of-care ultrasound-guided cannulation will likely lead to a paradigm shift in access cannulation. Novel care delivery using cannulation stations is a promising development.Recent advances in technology show promise in providing greater vascular access options for hemodialysis patients. This review discusses novel methods for creating an anastomosis for arteriovenous (AV) fistulas and new materials for prosthetic AV grafts. Two technologies for endovascular arteriovenous fistula creation, the Ellipsys and WavelinQ endovascular systems, are discussed. When an AV fistula is not possible, an AV graft or devices to augment the AV fistula may be appropriate. New materials that have been developed that show promise as an alternative to the expanded polytetrafluoroethylene graft are discussed. Such potential conduits include bioengineered vessels and both allogenic or xenogenic biologic grafts. Devices designed to optimize blood flow to reduce maturation failure and improve AV fistula outcomes are explored.The vascular access is the lifeline for the hemodialysis patient. Previous national vascular access guidelines have emphasized placement of arteriovenous fistulas in most hemodialysis patients. this website However, the new Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative guidelines for vascular access, soon to be published, will focus on a patient’s end-stage kidney disease “life plan” and take a patient “first” approach. One of the major themes of the new Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative guidelines is selecting the “right access, for the right patient, at the right time, for the right reason”. Given the availability of new advances in biomedical technologies, techniques, and devices in the vascular access field, this shift to a more patient-centered vascular access approach presents unique opportunities to individualize the solutions and care for patients requiring a dialysis vascular access. This review article will address 3 potential areas where there is an unmet need to individualize solutions for dialysis vascular access care (1) biological approaches to improve vascular access selection and selection of therapies, (2) vascular access care for the post-transplant patient, and (3) vascular access disparities in race, gender, and the elderly patient.